Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3770 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 24% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3110M - 189 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 20 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €315.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |