Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1126 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3110M - 174 vs 167 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €86.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |