Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than Core i3-13100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-13100 - 137 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
89.78102189781022%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€145.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €145.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2253
74.60264900662251%
Multi-Core
7337
40.15873015873016%
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |