Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i5-6600K - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 60 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €70.95 vs €152.26
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-13100 - €0.47 vs €0.96 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €152.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
151
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |