Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3193 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than FX-4350 - 131 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
