Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3823 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 155% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4350 - 605 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€511
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €511 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7156 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |