Buy on Amazon
€49.68
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2871 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than FX-6300 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6300 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
