Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i9-9900X - 354 vs 353 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - €108.43 vs €695.4
- Up to 84% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-9900X - €0.31 vs €1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
354
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €108.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Buy for €695.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |