Buy on Amazon
€88.23
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 10% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G530 - 492 vs 447 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €20.16 vs €88.23
- Up to 72% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i3-10105 - €0.05 vs €0.18 per FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €88.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
447
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G530 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,4 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
