Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €89.0 vs €529.37
- Up to 82% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900 - €0.35 vs €1.9 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 9% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-10100 - 279 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3446 minutes ago
Buy for €529.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3446 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |