Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €67.66 vs €138.86
- Up to 50% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-11600 - €0.31 vs €0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G6900 - 224 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 903 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
50%
Price, €
€138.86
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €138.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |