Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1356 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 2700 - 189 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - €66.9 vs €261.39
- Up to 77% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 2700 - €0.35 vs €1.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7501 minutes ago
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |