Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 444 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 7 2700 - 731 vs 702 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - €224.15 vs €261.39
- Up to 16% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 7 2700 - €0.31 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
702
96.0328317373461%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
83.78378378378379%
Price, €
€261.39
85%
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58462 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
731
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€224.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €224.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
65.80035440047254%
Multi-Core
5489
55.232441135037234%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |