Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 646 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G530 - 190 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
186
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |