Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than FX-8350 - 138 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than FX-8350 - €60.24 vs €155.88
- Up to 63% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8350 - €0.44 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15634 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |