Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 490 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930T - 121 vs 119 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
119
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |