Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 363 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930T - 277 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G3930T 2,7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35 W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€233.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-8700 Prozessor (12 MB Cache, bis zu 3.2 GHz)
Buy for €233.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
