Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €20.54 vs €178.46
- Up to 81% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12400 - €0.05 vs €0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 45% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3930T - 658 vs 455 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
455
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €178.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |