Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 142 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - €1.2 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €155.88 vs €169.95
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169.95
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €169.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12931 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12930 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |