Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 733 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 15 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 51 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
