Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3051 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 233 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65557 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
19.23841059602649%
Multi-Core
992
5.429666119321292%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |