Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €51.75 vs €412.78
- Up to 83% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-14700F - €0.23 vs €1.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 35% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 307 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
307
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
17%
Price, €
€412.78
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €412.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |