Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €53.15 vs €249.9
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - €0.31 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 193 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16538 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
24%
Price, €
€249.9
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |