Buy on Amazon
€102
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1197 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1840 - 123 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77615 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
43.01533219761499%
Multi-Core
854
12.24197247706422%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
