Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1036 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €104.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
46.41544117647059%
Multi-Core
854
15.32113383566559%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |