Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1449 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G1840 - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €172.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
40.82457558609539%
Multi-Core
854
16.22648679460384%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |