Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1893 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1840 - 305 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €63.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
48.00380228136882%
Multi-Core
854
28.343843345502822%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |