Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 79% better in Rust than Celeron G1610T - 267 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 32 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |