Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3694 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 28% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610T - 402 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
402
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |