Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1610 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
