Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3420 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3420 is 272 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610 - 80 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |