Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 607 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron B830 - 180 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |