Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2860 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 57% better in War Thunder than Celeron B820 - 192 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €246.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |