Key Differences
In short — Core i7-960 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-960 is 803 days older than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-960 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-960
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron B815 - 297 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
297
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€494.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €494.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |