Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4307 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 62% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron B815 - 167 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €467.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |