Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2025 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 7% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron 847 - 128 vs 120 FPS
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
