Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 3965U - 206 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 20 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€269
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |