Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2202 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 23% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron 3965U - 232 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 12 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |