Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 205 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron 3865U - 157 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €34.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |