Key Differences
In short — Celeron 3865U outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron 3865U is 2681 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |