Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 466 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 17 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 15% better in Minecraft than Celeron 1007U - 666 vs 579 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
666
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |