Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3438 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 64% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 254 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€266.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €266.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 776 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6350 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |