Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2552 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-6300 - 221 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1064.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,064.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8661 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |