The FX-6100 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-10105F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
FX-6100 vs Core i3-10105F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€84.19
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
FX-6100 vs Core i3-10105F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
