Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 618 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €66.37 vs €82.15
- Up to 18% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.54 vs €0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - 124 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |