Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3030 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 74% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6700 - 606 vs 349 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €134.84 vs €468.37
- Up to 49% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900KF - €0.39 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
606
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
51%
Price, €
€468.37
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €468.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
349
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €134.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |