Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €134.84 vs €163.90
- Up to 11% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-13400F - €1.17 vs €1.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-6700 - 125 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
115
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €134.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6828 minutes ago
Buy for €163.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6827 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |