Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-12900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 266 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-12900.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €493.16 vs €526.20
- Up to 12% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900 - €3.63 vs €4.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€493.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €493.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Buy for €526.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |