Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €469.00 vs €668.47
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900K - €3.13 vs €4.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €668.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€469
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |