Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900F - 461 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €400.98 vs €469.00
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-12700F - €0.89 vs €1.02 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 372 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
452
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€400.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €400.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 372 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |